Influence of International Collaboration on the Research Impact of Young Universities
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction It is widely presumed that international collaboration benefits the researchers and the organisations involved, and enhances the quality of research (Persson, 2010). However, research also suggests that the effects of international collaboration may vary across disciplines and the authors’ countries (Moed, 2005). In this study, we investigated the effect of international collaboration on the impact of publications of selected young universities, and compared to that of renowned old universities. The 5-year citations per paper (CPP) data, the international collaboration rate, the CPP differential between publications with and without international collaborations, and the difference between the percentages of international collaborated publications falling in the global top 10% highly cited publications and the percentage of overall publications falling in the global top 10% highly cited publications (Δ%Top10%) are used as the impact indications. These data are extracted from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science (WoS) database and Essential Science Indicator (ESI) based on papers published from 2004 to 2013. Young institutions ranked by the 2014 Times Higher Education (THE)’s 100 under 50 Universities are selected in this study, and some renowned universities (> 100 years old) are selected as references for “old universities”. To eliminate the discipline difference effect, the increment of 5-year (2010-2014) field weighted citation impact (FWCI) of internationally collaborated papers over the 5-year overall FWCI of the institutions in SciVal® of Elsevier is used as another indicator. The collaboration among 8 old institutions and 8 young institutions are investigated.
منابع مشابه
Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora
We use a data set of Mexican researchers working abroad that are included in the Mexican National System of Researchers (SNI). Our diaspora sample includes 479 researchers, most of them holding postdoctoral positions in mainly seven countries: USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Canada and Brazil. Their research output and impact is explored in order to determine their patterns of produ...
متن کاملThe Collaboration of National and International Centers in Health Care Researches: Some Ethical Issues
This article reviews some of the ethical aspects of collaborative research or collaboration of national and international centers in health car researches. Scientific collaborations are of potential advantages, but, it’s a challenging task to successfully accomplish a collaborative research on ethically sound grounds. Current trends in international collaborative healthcare researches reflect l...
متن کاملتاثیر همکاریهای بینالمللی پژوهشی بر کیفیت تولیدات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
Introduction: International collaboration is beneficial for both researchers and institutions and enhances the quality of research output. The present study therefore sought to: 1- investigate the quality of scientific outputs of Tehran University of Medical Sciences produced through international collaboration, and 2- ascertain the most collaborative countries and institutions of the same univ...
متن کاملA Survey of Scientific Outputs of Iranian Researchers in the Field of Poisonous Animals in Web of Science: a Scientometric Study
ISI Web of Science (WOS) is the world's most prestigious database that is used in order to evaluate and rank the countries, researchers, institutions, and universities. Therefore, determining the status of Iranian articles in this database in the field of poisonous and venomous animals is important. Quantitative and qualitative assessments of scientific outputs are the main goals of this study....
متن کاملCollaboration makes an elite school ?
Scientific collaboration is a popular issue in the literature on knowledge production. Although previous studies show that scientific teamwork becomes dominant and is related to the impact of scientific results, empirical results of this research reveal that collaboration itself is not “the almighty” for quality research. This study finds the following three stylized facts. First, Korean univer...
متن کامل